Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancing with the Dead


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. T. Canens (talk) 17:17, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Dancing with the Dead

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unreferenced since December 2009, fails to meet WP:NALBUM since it's unlikely it will be expanded beyond its current state. I only managed to find one blog review (metal-observer) and one review on sputnikmusic, but it was a user-submitted review, not a staff review. Neither help achieve notability. – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 10:38, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I don’t know if this helps, but I found several ”professional” reviews in Finnish (my native language): Soundi, Noise.fi, Mesta.net, Imperiumi.net, Findance.com and Desibeli.net. And these in English: Metal Rules, Metal Storm (user-submitted?) and Lords of Metal. Several in German as well, but I won’t include them here as I don’t really know the language. The album and the single ”Same Old Song” have also charted on the Swedish and the Finnish charts, which is at least information that the article can easily be expanded with. –Kooma (talk) 09:19, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Those absolutely would help. Sources in foreign languages are fine and the charting would solidify the notability. – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 12:59, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per above and ; peaked at number 3 in the Swedish Albums Chart with 7 weeks being in the charts, and peaked at number 16 with 4 weeks being in the charts. Ask User:Kai81 if he can find more of these indie sources, especially since he is from Finland and an expert in respect of music industry.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 16:15, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 30 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.