Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancing with the Stars (U.S. TV series) scoring statistics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 18:45, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Dancing with the Stars (U.S. TV series) scoring statistics

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Proposed deletion contested without comments or improvements. Proposed deletion reason was: "WP:NOT for lists of statistics. The show is obviously notable, but a rehash of it in statistical form is not the way to go." Fram (talk) 09:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete – I only created the article because of the ridiculous amount of space this information took up in the main article. Sottolacqua (talk) 11:25, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per WP:NOT, and express continuing displeasure at our PROD policy that allows an anon IP, with no justification whatsoever, to throw a wrench in the process. Tarc (talk) 13:58, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete; agree with WP:NOT. This information is only relevant to a fraction of the people who watch the show, and that's only a fraction of the general WP audience. This stuff belongs on a Dancing with the Stars wiki, not on here. &mdash; Timneu22 · talk 13:59, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - fancruft at its most trivially useless. If somebody tries to reinsert all of this crud in the main article, please refer them to this discussion. -- Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  00:05, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as this list topic or a definition for this list appears to have not been published anywhere else other than Wikipedia, as it does not have a verifiable definition and contravenes the prohibition on original research as illustrated by WP:MADEUP. If it has not be been published anywhere else, and there is no evidence that it is verifiable, let alone notable list topic, then there is no rationale for inclusion. To demonstrate that this topic was not created based on editor's own whim, a verifiable definition is needed to provide external validation that this list complies with content policy. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 08:45, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete this excessive listing of statistics. Cliff smith  talk  19:30, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.