Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dandali Na


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:08, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Dandali Na

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable website lacking non-trivial support. Fails WP:WEB. red dog six (talk) 14:21, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 17:05, 18 March 2014 (UTC)




 * Comments: Has any notable Nigerian newspaper written anything on this topic? if yes please provide links....and aside from the fact a not very popular actress used it, what other notable thing can be said about of it? I am Nigerian....I love social networks and internet a lot, so am surprised that I have never heard about it if its really notable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darreg (talk • contribs) 14:13, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - Let's be clear that having an actress use the site is not a criteria for Wikipedia accepted notability. red dog six  (talk) 15:15, 19 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment- Thanks for the clarification. I just finished reading Wikipedia notability guidelines again and one thing that struck me is that "Notability is not Temporary". I cannot guarantee the permanent (or consistent) notability status for this article(that is even if it has any atom of notability). The only independent notable source on the article was not even talking about the Social Network independently but the actress that owns and uses the Social Network.
 * http://weekend.peoplesdailyng.com/index.php/entertainment/kannywood-nollywood/2616-kannywood-i-quickly-learned-hausa-::and-english-languages-to-become-actress-gabon


 * However I am quite skeptical about choosing a side (I don't want to make a mistake in my judgement), so I would sit on the fence and allow other Wikipedians choose sides. Darreg (talk) 16:03, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Delete: The website doesn't meet any wikipedia's notability guideline. Almost half of it's references are from twitter, the other references are from blogs.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:29, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Delete: The article is lacking reliable references. This source only talks about the life of the founder, and not about the social networking service. versace1608 (talk) 02:11, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Delete: I share exactly the same view as Jamie and Versace but initially did not want to be the first to throw the stone. In my opinion the article lacks reliable independent references and does not PRESENTLY meet Wikipedia notability criteria. Darreg (talk) 07:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.