Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dandelion coffee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep  per the snowball clause as well as hand out barnstars to ChildofMidnight and LinguistAtLarge for the article rescue. Non-admin closure. MuZemike ( talk ) 23:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Dandelion coffee

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

How-to on nonnotable topic. HeureusementIci (talk) 05:59, 25 December 2008 (UTC) I reworked it into a more acceptable piece. ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:18, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep On the one hand, I don't know if anything in the article is salvageable. On the other hand, looking on the web the topic seems to be notable (for Dandelion tea and coffee). So I think it should be fixed. I have no objection to wiping it clean and adding two sourced sentences... ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:51, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep evidently notable. Colonel Warden (talk) 09:21, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:56, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep following rework. Tevildo (talk) 11:40, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Reworked article shows it's a verifiable beverage and the content is now encyclopedic. - Mgm|(talk) 15:12, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Ditto. Aymatth2 (talk) 00:39, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Good job ChildofMidnight!  Linguist At Large  07:29, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep at time of nomination the article had problems, but now it's pretty much exactly as an article should be; thank you to ChildofMidnight and LinguistAtLarge, who appear to have rescued it. &mdash;Politizer talk / contribs 16:31, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.