Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danger Close


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:12, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Danger Close

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This has been orphaned for a long time, and is probably more suited for the article on artillery. Notability questionable. Wikipedia is not a dictionary (What Wikipedia is not). Aurush kazemini (talk) 22:40, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  23:35, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to artillery. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge, but because it's orphaned. I have no problem with these terms being explained if they were obviously created to aid an another article, but this hasn't. Ryan 4314   (talk) 03:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This is nothing but a dictionary definition and can't be expanded. I don't think that it's that likely a search term, so deletion might be better than a merge. Nick-D (talk) 06:58, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * According to the traffic stats, it gets a few hits every day and remember it's totally orphaned so those people aren't being wikilinked to it. Ryan 4314   (talk) 15:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - dicdef transwiki to wiktionary; no significant subject. Laudak (talk) 00:51, 24 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.