Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danger From The Deep


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus here seems to be that the article does not meet notability requirements. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:06, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Danger From The Deep

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A non-notable computer game that does not assert notability with reliable sources. Plenty of Google hits, but no Google News hits. Scjessey (talk) 18:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment: I have also done some searching in the google news archives for this game and found a couple of articles written in what looks like German here and here. For the regular search I think this blog (in english) "might" be interesting. As for notability I think the jury is still out on it for now. - Dlrohrer  2003  20:13, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. I have added some sources (I think at least about.com should be prominent enough), and as you say, Google knows a lot about it, and, in the context of free Linux games (which is far from huge), this is relatively major software. LjL (talk) 20:15, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. LjL (talk) 20:27, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete nowhere near notability standard in terms of depth of coverage. About.com is fine as a source IMO, but the piece is nothing more than a couple of sentences worth of signpost. The first German source consists of two nearly identical paragraphs (God knows what that's about), the second is again a handful of sentences consisting of things like how to switch it German-language and that the game is still in early development. There's bot-all to write an article with. Someoneanother 21:06, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


 * So you find that the subject is notable but since the article currently is not, it should be deleted anyway...? --LjL (talk) 01:45, 5 July 2009 (UTC) Sorry, misread what you wrote. --LjL (talk) 01:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable and not enough coverage. About.com source may be a decent source, but it's a fleeting mention. Greg Tyler (t &bull; c) 22:52, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:15, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Has not received enough coverage (WP:N). An interesting project, hopefully we'll see it here again in the future. Marasmusine (talk) 10:55, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete- It isn't notable and there isn't enough coverage.--Samic130 (talk) 17:21, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.