Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danger Trance Incorporated


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  20:30, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Danger Trance Incorporated
this is a vanity article. a quick search on discogs.com and juno.co.uk gives no results for this group, and there's no way they can be pioneers of gabber if they formed in 2005. "Danger Trance Incorporated" gives a paltry 13 hits on google, and their label "TranceFusion Records" gives only 68 results. sorry to those who have put effort into cleaning the article up but i'm putting this up for afd. compare with nu style gabber/darkcore label enzyme records which gives 72,600 results. --MilkMiruku 18:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete: convincing and thorough nomination works for me. Politepunk 18:44, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: per WP:MUSIC --Larsinio 20:19, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Bucketsofg 22:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. "TranceFusion Records" seems to have been a Detroit techno label in the early 90s, but now there is a new label in California, here .  It's not clear that there's any connection to the music mentioned in the article, and the "awards" have no verifiability.  So, NN or vanity, or partial or complete hoax.  Slowmover 23:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I whumped this page up a bit, as I wanted to see if there was an article buried in there somewhere. I agree that, in the absence of the sources and references that it so clearly needs, it does not meet the WP:MUSIC guidelines. The lack of google hits is another nail in its coffin. Delete. Sliggy 00:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.