Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dangerous Ishq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:36, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Dangerous Ishq

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unreleased film is not notable. Eel Tours (talk) 17:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 17:40, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

 ]]''' 01:20, 31 August 2011 (UTC) 
 * Redirect for now to the director's article at Vikram Bhatt where the film's planning is spoken of in sourced context. It IS getting press, but the project is not ready yet to be considered as a possible exception to WP:NFF. As principle filming draws closer we can reconsider an article. But not just yet.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:23, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I think it is fair to assume that this film would actually be made even though it is in the pre-production stage. It has stirred an interest in the Indian media. It can be AfD'd later if the project drops or so. &mdash; Fιnεmαnn''' [[:en:User_talk:Finemann| (talk)
 * Sorry, but the Indian film industry is prone to even more vaugeries than are other film industries, and getting out early rumors/word of planned projects is intended to stir up interest and financing. As it curently fails WP:NFF, the best option per WP:FUTURE is the redirect, which will preserve the history and can easily be reverted if/when filming actually does commence.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:01, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha Quadrant    talk    00:17, 1 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep for now at least unless something happens to this film. CapMan07008 (talk) 00:45, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * We do not "keep" because it might be made, we keep when it IS made or has a great deal more coverage. The redirect will preserve the history and can be reverted if "something happens to this film."  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:01, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * As Shcmidt said, you have the whole keep/delete thing backwards. --Odie5533 (talk) 05:59, 1 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: Film has received significant coverage in many reliable sources in English, and probably loads more in Hindu which I don't know how to search for. Examples: BollywoodHungama, The Times of India, OneIndia.in, HindustanTimes. --Odie5533 (talk) 05:59, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I like this discusion being relisted. If the star's request to push up the production is acted upon, we might have evidence of principle filming by September 6. THAT would change my mind about the redirect. But even if not forthcoming, and AS we already have some information in the director's article, we might redirect the title as I suggested above, and then Incubate this for a short time for continued work?  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I suggest this, as the sources offered as being about the film's production, are actually articles about Karisma Kapoor herself and her planned role in the film... it and not so much about the film itself... and we have nothing yet about any other possible cast. Interestingly, in Kappor's article, we have this film mentioned as one sentence at the very end of Karisma Kapoor.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:25, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.