Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dangi (people)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. Also nom has been temp blocked via arbitration enforcement. (non-admin closure) ミラP 01:13, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Dangi (people)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Clearly fails WP:NOTE and WP:BIO, since 2008 this has been with this one line stub, other things added are without citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dey subrata (talk • contribs) Dey subrata (talk) 03:31, 27 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:53, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:53, 27 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. This isn't a biography, so WP:BIO doesn't apply. As per notability, I would say that the references present in the article prove the notability of the caste. The references are solid and reliable, too. The article can stay as a stub in my opinion, but the subject is definitely notable. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:01, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - This is a minority ppl in India and not a biography. I have added 8 book sources into the article. - Clearly pass WP:GNG. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:19, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. what Utopes said. Senegambianamestudy (talk) 07:26, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Per above.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 07:30, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems like a notable caste. -- Mikeblas (talk) 03:46, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep No evidence of BEFORE; easily identifiable RSs. AfD is not cleanup. --Goldsztajn (talk) 16:50, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is so improve the article out of a micro stub, don't just claim it can be theoretically done.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:08, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.