Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dangiuz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Cavarrone 06:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Dangiuz

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

He has done a lot of PR for himself, but no one can buy notability. No in-depth source to pass WP:GNG. Jsfodness (talk) 03:19, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 07:27, 8 May 2022 (UTC)


 * As someone who tries to keep updated and create many criteria-meeting articles related to Digital Art/CryptoCurrency/NFTs, I'm quite surprised to see this one being nominated for AfD, as it's arguably one of the most notable digital artists and possibly the most famous Italian (digital) one. While I do realize the niche of the topic discussed, I'm gonna address the issues like the related article suggests. Some of the issues were already addressed and reviewed in past, in fact, there are many reliable sources in the article and a couple of new ones that still needs to be added. I'm gonna reference the missing ones below and I will be furthermore adding them to the article.
 * Vanity Fair
 * GQ Italy
 * GQ Japan
 * WWD
 * Fanpage.it
 * Yahoo News


 * ___
 * My vote is KEEP. Always assume good faith, but some sources are 3 clicks away and really should be checked into before proposing an AfD. JohnnyCoal (talk) 08:38, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Every single of the english-speaking and italian sources you gave us does mention Dangiuz. As one of many. There is no WP:SIGCOV. Delete. Lurking shadow (talk) 13:27, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * While this is partially true, this applies only to the six sources listed in the AfD discussion, and not to the other 35+ sources listed on the article itself. On top of that, even on the mentions, might be worth to mention that the main images in the given sources are in fact credited as Dangiuzs art works. Keep' JohnnyCoal (talk) 13:53, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep The sources I see do grant WP:ARTIST notability. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:29, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 01:34, 16 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:31, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * comment putting refs with afd Dangiuz discussion. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:01, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep WP:ARTIST notability is met exactly like in other related articles eg Sarah Zucker / XCOPY (artist) / Refik Anadol & more. Skyfullofstars96 (talk) 09:46, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per JohnnyCoal. Established artist. Multiple exhibitions, media coverage and commercial stats should be considered enough to pass WP:GNG. Alsl8920 (talk) 22:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep how is this even an AfD? significant references and mentions and showcasing in museums. user (User:Jsfodness) who proposed the AfD has been proposing about 100 AfD in one day and even got WP:ANI’d for doing so… probably vandalism. AlsPkY (talk) 23:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.