Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dani Gaíl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Dani Gaíl

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article about a footballer who has only made 4 substitute's appearances in the Segunda División (for less than 90 minutes of total play). WP:NFOOTBALL provides a presumption of notability based on that nominal amount of play, but there is longstanding consensus that this presumption is invalid when WP:GNG is comprehensively failed as it is here. I've searched English- and Spanish-language online sources and can only locate trivial coverage (e.g., database entries, match reports, injury reports, transfer announcements). Gaíl played during the Internet-era, so the fact that online archives of Spanish football magazine Mundo Deportivo contain no significant coverage strongly suggests we won't find anything but trivial coverage. Jogurney (talk) 17:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Spain. Shellwood (talk) 17:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:35, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with a handful of appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:52, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:20, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No source since 2020. It's a forgotten article, and will remain forgotten, as I haven't found any relevant facts about the player. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 03:43, 4 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.