Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dania V. Francis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Dania V. Francis

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Assistant prof with a postdoc award, don't see how meets WP:NPROF. Not convinced being in Fortune magazine and a bit of other coverage meets WP:GNG. Seems like WP:TOOSOON perhaps. Kj cheetham (talk) 14:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women,  and Economics. Kj cheetham (talk) 14:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF for this 2013 PhD, although it is a reasonably good start.  Inclusion in a listicle is not much progress towards GNG, and the early career award does not contribute much towards notability. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 14:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Has not yet accumulated the impact needed for WP:PROF, and the Fortune piece is not enough by itself for WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:54, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete does not pass NPROF Mccapra (talk) 19:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above and per my C1 argument when tagging this article for notability earlier. JoelleJay (talk) 00:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with the comments above, especially those of David Eppstein (talk) Athel cb (talk) 13:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.