Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel-Philippe de Sudres


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 09:30, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Daniel-Philippe de Sudres

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO, the external link citations are dubious JMHamo (talk) 12:12, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 23:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 23:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 23:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 02:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Does anyone speak French? The French-language version of the article may shed some light on whether this person meets the English Wikipedia's notability guidelines or not.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  03:16, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The French article is thinner than ours; its only reference is a link (currently dead) to his entry as an author in the catalogue of the French national library. JohnCD (talk) 21:41, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now and WP:TNT and start when better as although my searches found results at Books, News, browser and Scholar, there's nothing to suggest immediate better improvement so this will likely need familiar attention. SwisterTwister   talk  06:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete -- I cannot find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. Jujutacular (talk) 00:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.