Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Adair


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  16:21, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Daniel Adair

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article gives the appearance that it was self-published for promotional purposes. furthermore The article is a biography of a living person, lacking sources congruent with appearing in encyclopedic text. Silverfish8088 (talk) 17:01, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (lecture)  @ 16:27, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep: The article needs a rewrite, but apparently he's actually in Nickelback, and was in 3 Doors Down? As much as this all pains me, there are sources that merit consideration.  And he didn't end up with a slew of other language wikipedia articles out of nowhere.--Milowent • hasspoken  03:11, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Adair meets notability criteria #6, specifically he "is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensemble". Regardless of anyone's opinion on their music, 3 Doors Down and Nickelback are definitely notable bands and Adair received independent coverage for his work in both of them. The article needs better sourcing, not deletion. A quick Google search demonstrates that there are plenty of reliable sources to be had with which to improve the article.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 15:46, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 12:33, 20 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets wp:band. Dcfc1988 (talk) 22:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.