Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Anton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:25, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Daniel Anton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be a self publicist with nothing notable to shout about. No evidence from the sources of any notability. He has been in the army, he started up a company etc. etc. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 22:01, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Correction. Not self publicist but more probably paid to have an article as authored by an almost immediately blocked sock, part of a large sock farm.  Velella  Velella Talk  22:05, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 22:07, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 22:07, 12 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. His army and business careers are nothing special, routine. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:20, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Some of the refs are incorrectly used. For example, the Senate action doesn't actually say he was promoted (He probably was). The Order of Saint Maurice should have been Order of Saint Maurice (United States) (big difference) and the cited document is just a list without any explanation. The first ref is about a baseball game.-- Georgia Army Vet  Contribs  Talk  02:13, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete His army service and medal, while contributing to his notability, do not meet SOLDIER by themselves. Sourcing is scant. Searching for more in a BEFORE doesn't yield much (it does yield police record - of possibly a different Anton - of little notability, though perhaps they may be a motivation for creating a positive wiki page).Icewhiz (talk) 06:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability. Fails WP:SOLDIER. One appearance on a TV show may be enough for the IMDb, but not here. Some mentions in a book (which is cited twice). I don't think it is fake, but it is largely unsourced.  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  06:11, 13 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.