Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Barel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 01:58, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Daniel Barel

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable businessman—fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Most coverage is focused on his company, REE Automotive, rather than him personally. Normally I would redirect to the company, but that article was deleted per Articles for deletion/REE Automotive (and subsequently salted). I can't see the deleted article, but it appears that this bio reuses many of the unreliable sources from the company article. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 08:37, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 08:37, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 08:37, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:55, 13 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Draftify or Delete. I prodded the article for similar reasons, but then deprodded it at user SotoRoto's request when they said they intended to move it to REE Automotive (which I think is a potentially notable topic). So perhaps moving it to Draft:REE Automotive is a suitable approach here? MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:04, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Since this article is about the CEO, I think it would be better to just delete and start a draft about the company from scratch. The situation with the company article is already messy, and we don't need a convoluted page move history to compound that. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:49, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree that starting afresh also has its merits. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:15, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Draftify is a good choice when it is unclear in which direction the content is going. Maybe it ends up merged into the parent company, maybe it gets edited to meet notability requirements at WP:ANYBIO. Ifnord (talk) 13:59, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete and oppose draftify. It's pretty clear from WP:BEFORE searches that the subject will not meet GNG or ANYBIO. Best to start completely over on an article on REE Automotive.4meter4 (talk) 22:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Really no coverage to speak of with this individual.  To the extent he shows up it all, it is entirely within the context of the company.  Doesn't make sense to draftify when there isn't any indication that this individual will be independently notable IMHO.  DocFreeman24 (talk) 00:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.