Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Bester

Daniel Bester was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete.

Appears to be a giant hoax. Just look at the Daniel Bester Web site --LeeHunter 00:19, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Either that or a listing of a comic book or soap opera character. But it's not worth a separate page. Delete. Inky 01:10, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - UtherSRG 01:30, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete -- I think that Ned "Bullseye" Bester is part of the same campaign, probably a ad campaign for some movie. --jpgordon{gab} 01:59, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * I don't know, I checked google and it seems legit. --User:roryaxis 11:38 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Previous comment was by User:68.237.254.193, originator of Daniel Bester, who previously erased this entire entry. --jpgordon{gab} 05:08, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * I dunno. There are a lot of German Google hits for it. Keep it. --User:Norg 11:52 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * This editor has no history other than this entry (and a minor edit to User:68.237.254.193's entry.) --jpgordon{gab} 05:08, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * Don't forget Daniel Bester Inc. which could also be removed as a copyrightvio (actually, I donno. The same author probably wrote both, but it's obviously not encyclopedic: "We at Bester Inc...") Another site proclaims that Bester Inc. is evil and advances various conspiracy theories, so I'd guess we're in the middle of some online mystery. Why do we have to deal with this crap? It doesnt look like they're done yet though, so maybe this will send them a message to find someone else to host their clues. Delete. Cool Hand Luke  06:35, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * It looks like some kid's lit class project. Delete.


 * Looks like a hoax to me - nothing more than sneaky vandalism. CSD.


 * For more evidence about this articles hoax-ness: see this. Delete huwr 09:27, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.