Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Birchall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No evidence of notability via WP:BIO/WP:PROF joe deckertalk to me 17:31, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Daniel Birchall

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I declined a speedy A7 request on this article, taking it to AfD instead. This is basically a glorified resume of a non-notable individual. Doesn't appear to pass the criteria at WP:BIO or WP:ACADEMIC. -Scottywong | babble _ 16:42, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. The article doesn't describe his research.  It doesn't read like a biography at all... it reads like an AUTObiograpgy written in the third person.  This smacks of personal fluffery. Roodog2k (talk) 17:20, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Gratuitous WP:RESUME. Doesn't meet WP:PROF (lots of hits on Google Scholar for "D Birchall" but it's a different person, working in medical imaging; no claim to have held a significant position at any university or similar institution) and no other indication of notability. Dricherby (talk) 23:27, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom; it consists of a bunch of stuff I obviously don't even think of as worth mentioning on my user page... obviously I shouldn't have joked about notability on said page (fixed). But hey, maybe we should make a page about that brain surgeon guy Dricherby mentioned! ;)  08:36, 28 May 2012 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danbirchall (talk • contribs)
 * Delete per nominator and subject. There's lots of verifiable detail here but nothing that would support notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:07, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom, it does fail WP:BIO. While there are sources on the article, most of them are not so reliable and they are not enough to establish WP:N  →TSU tp* 04:27, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.