Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Bogard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:43, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Daniel Bogard

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD with no reason given, player has not played in a fully professional league therefore fails WP:NFOOTBALL & has also not received significant media coverage & also fails WP:GNG. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 15:56, 7 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 16:02, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 16:02, 7 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 16:02, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Player does not meet WP:GNG or relevant football guidelines. Edinburgh   Wanderer  16:33, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 16:35, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - he has not played in a fully pro league, or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:15, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just barely fails WP:NFOOTBALL - Portsmouth is in a fully professional league, but although he was on their team he never made an appearance. - Jorgath (talk) (contribs) 21:37, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 13:26, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.