Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Bostic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:11, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Daniel Bostic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not meet criteria of WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. He has had minor roles in a few films (four, with two of them as an extra ). References provided either do not mention him, or mention him trivially. Contested prod. ... disco spinster   talk  03:58, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Daniel has roles in multiple films. His most recent being "Secrets in the Fall" which is distributed by BMG and is currently the best selling Christian film in the nation. He was featured in an American Eagle print campaign and in their billboard on times square. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bostiholics (talk • contribs) 04:00, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: Secrets in the Fall hasn't been released yet so how can it be the "best selling Christian film in the nation"? ... disco spinster   talk  04:05, 10 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete And highly recommend WP:SALT to closing admin, since this has been PRODed three times already. No notability whatsoever in November of last year, and none now. § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:58, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Just go ahead and delete it please, I completely agree that I don't have the notability for a wikipedia page. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Debostic (talk • contribs) 21:35, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 16 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per short career of minor roles in non-notable productions failing WP:ENT, and lack of any sort of coverage in reliable sources failing WP:GNG. No prejudice for recreation if or when this changes. There is really no reason to SALT, as the inexperienced 9-lifetime-edits-ever User:Bostiholics simply does not understand WP:N and WP:RS....and even with his blanking of the article on February 11, if that user does not learn, we have other ways to deal with behavior of individual contributors. Gonna drop him a personal note sending him to WP:PRIMER.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:29, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.