Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Brandt (7th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy kept Jaranda wat's sup 21:49, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Daniel Brandt
This guy does not want an article on Wikipedia. You all are failing to understand this. It's been said millions of times that notability has nothing to do with keeping this article and you still don't understand. If you vote for keep, vote for a better reason than notability. This article should be deleted as this person doesn't want an article. Delete. Gostic 21:26, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Did you look at the Talk page of the article and the six keep AfD discussion logs listed there? What is the reason for the seventh nomination? Does the article involve libel?   (aeropagitica)    (talk)   21:37, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. 152.163.100.10 21:38, 10 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep, bad faith nomination, speedy kept just 5 days ago. I'm adding this vote after the closure by Jaranda, who is not an admin, just in case someone reverses it.  Mango juice talk 19:03, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.