Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Carver

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 12:15, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC)

I count five keeps (including Kappa), four merges, and two deletes. Further attempts to establish a consensus whether to merge should be continued on the articles' talk pages. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 12:15, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC)

Daniel Carver
Is this a case of KKK-kruft or notability? Are individuals who are actively participating in the Ku Klux Klan and make appearances on the Howard Stern radio show noteworthy and encyclopedic? If yes, why? GRider\talk 23:58, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, and expand. Megan1967 00:48, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Stern's show is notable, so his regular guests should be explained somewhere. Prefer "Keep" if he's senior in the KKK or notorious outside Howard Stern, if not prefer merge (not delete) to The Wack Pack or somewhere. Based on the article, prefer merge. Kappa 01:33, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. He is apparently an Imperial Wizard and Grand Dragon of the KKK. Megan1967 03:53, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Rhobite 02:19, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge. ComCat 02:55, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge. --Sn0wflake 03:14, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, NN. --iMeowbot~Mw 13:21, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * keep and expandXpendersx 20:58, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge to the The Wack Pack, see also Votes for deletion/Beetlejuice the Dwarf --nixie 12:09, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, probably. Although I work on our coverage of neo-Nazi and white supremacist movements, I'm reluctant to give too much coverage to individual members unless they achieve verifiable note of some sort. This guy probably passes, though - David Gerard 23:58, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. See criteria for inclusion of biographies. --Pjacobi 00:51, 2005 Feb 21 (UTC)
 * Merge to The Wack Pack. Subject clearly doesn't conform to the criteria of inclusion on his own.  The subject is distasteful to many, but that doesn't mean he shouldn't be included. Fernando Rizo 01:02, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.