Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Carver (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  06:33, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Daniel Carver
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to satisfy WP:GNG. Ambrosiaster (talk) 17:56, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I think three independent sources is enough for the article to pass WP:GNG. 344917661X (talk)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 07:58, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:13, 9 June 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep The sourcing in the article seems weak and I do not believe it is enough to justify an article in itself. This indicates there was a Nightline interview with him so NEXIST comes into play. If he were simply some Howard Stern Show interviewee I would not think there is enough out there on which to base an article but there is nearly always something reported in RS before Nightline becomes interested.  Jbh  Talk  14:16, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I also think the 3 different, reliable sources are enough to keep this article. While it is a stub it's cited, and neutral. S EMMENDINGER  ( talk ) 23:25, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete local area coverage does not show notability. This really fails any reasonable reading of our fringe coverage guidelines. A few local interests stories in newspapers do not overcome the inherent problems of this article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:17, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:28, 16 June 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Enigmamsg 05:09, 24 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.