Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Cooney Fine Art


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Weak delete is still delete Eddie891 Talk Work 22:22, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Daniel Cooney Fine Art

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PR, notability lacking, product of paid editing: see Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard Acousmana (talk) 19:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Acousmana (talk) 19:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Galleries are very rarely notable. the sources provided are about artists who show at the gallery, rather than the gallery. GNG fail. --- Possibly (talk) 22:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete galleries can be quite notable, but struggling to find significant, independent sourcing for this one at the moment. Will keep looking as I feel like I have seen coverage that might help it by.      StarM 02:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - If I were reviewing this submission at AFC, I would decline it as reflecting what the gallery says about itself and not what third parties say about it. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:26, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per above. The three books in WorldCat are all by, not about this gallery. I'll have to do more research. Bearian (talk) 16:34, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.