Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel DiPlacido


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rock Hill, Missouri.  MBisanz  talk 23:50, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Daniel DiPlacido

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable politician. DiPlacido's role as mayor of Rock Hill, Missouri, a town of ~4,600 people, and his lack of coverage that goes beyond the ordinary for the mayor of such a small town, do not merit inclusion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge content about blight-area develpment to article on Rock Hill, Missouri. That article would probably be helped by an explanation of what form of city government Rock Hill has.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:09, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete instead and only mention however needed at community article, I'm not seeing how we should actually keep this open to restarting as I'm questionable whether he could ever have his own notable article. SwisterTwister   talk  04:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  04:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  04:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN or WP:BIO AusLondonder (talk) 02:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Small-town mayors do not get automatic inclusion rights per WP:NPOL. A person at this level of office can get a Wikipedia article if they previously or subsequently held a more notable office, or if you can reliably source them as more notable than the norm for some substantive reason — but three pieces of purely local media coverage that verify his existence, but fail to be substantively about him, is not what it takes. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 15:33, 18 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.