Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Estulin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep.  Singu larity  08:23, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Daniel Estulin

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable conspiracy theorist; lack of independent reliable sources Tom Harrison Talk 13:12, 21 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep: While this fellow is a wingnut and the only cited source is the Coast to Coast AM site -- on the Reliable Sources scale, somewhere between Erich Von Daniken and Tawana Brawley -- he is widely known in conspiracy circles and has nearly fifty thousand Google hits to attest to it, thus passing the WP:BIO bar of someone with a widespread cult following.    Ravenswing  14:55, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Ravenswing. wikipediatrix 16:12, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Concur with Ravenswing. He's well known in conspiracy theory circles. That doesn't excuse the terrible sourcework, of course... Bullzeye (Complaint Dept./Brilliant Acts) 16:13, 21 August 2007 (UTC)


 * keep: Evidently has made noteworthy contributions as an investigative writer.  Ombudsman 04:02, 22 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.