Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Feikin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)    03:36, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Daniel Feikin

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Sure, the doctor is published in the New York Times, but the article doesn't assert his importance. I removed the "Awards" Section as it was unsourced. Also, his bio was a copyvio which I also removed  intelati  talk 00:54, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 01:54, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 01:55, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Has a GS h-index of 24 in the bio-med field. May be sufficient for WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:56, 26 September 2011 (UTC).
 * Keep Clearly meets WP:ACADEMIC; some of his articles have been cited hundreds of times. I added some information and references to the article. --MelanieN (talk) 14:50, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep sufficient evidence for notability as researcher and administrator.  DGG ( talk ) 03:22, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.