Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Guzmán-García


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. T. Canens (talk) 09:17, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Daniel Guzmán-García

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Nonnotable supercentenarian without reliable sources. See WT:WOP. More as needed. JJB 23:49, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 *  Keep first verified supercentenarian of a continent is notable. Longevitydude (talk) 19:29, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete This article has no reliable sources. Both the footnote and the obituary come from Gerontology Research Group web pages. There's some controversy about whether GRG pages are simply not reliable, whether they are biased against non-western centenarians or whether they are primary sources, prohibited for citation by WP:NOR. Whichever way one goes, they cannot be the sole source for an article.  (The external link to the reprint of an obit may also be a copyright violation.) David in DC (talk) 21:45, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I could find only a single news source about this man, plus his inclusion in a list at something called liebertonline That's not enough for notability. As I have argued above, simply being the oldest person in a given country does not grant automatic notability. The usual Wikipedia guidelines for sourcing must be met, on a case-by-case basis, and they are not met for this person.  --MelanieN (talk) 21:57, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.