Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Hoffmann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nominator withdrew, nobody !voted anything other than keep -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Daniel Hoffmann

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Only one line. Doesn't state why the player is notable in the context of the article. Attempted to CSD but tag was removed. Cssiitcic (talk) 21:55, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - he has played top level football in four different countries. ArtVandelay13 (talk) 22:28, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * If he has done this, can someone put that info in the context of the article. This article needs MAJOR expansion.Cssiitcic (talk) 22:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It says "five years in the Bundesliga", with a context link to tell you what the Bundesliga is. It's a stub, but that's not grounds for deletion, certainly not CSD. ArtVandelay13 (talk) 23:12, 6 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep - Numerous appearances for several professional clubs. Including over 100 for Hansa Rostock. Sunderland06  (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - per the above. I've sourced the appearances for Hansa and 1860 Munich (it's in German, but it's easy to read). Easily passes WP:ATHLETE. Black Kite 23:22, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. GiantSnowman 00:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - clearly notable, a lazy nomination. GiantSnowman 00:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Snowball keep - article about a clearly notable footballer which easily passes WP:ATHLETE. Jogurney (talk) 03:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Withdraw- I withdraw this AfD. It's OK to keep it.Cssiitcic (talk) 20:29, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.