Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Hohler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 22:00, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Daniel Hohler

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Bio is of a blogger and lacks secondary sources independent of the subject; indeed, most of the article is drawn from self-published sources. I conclude it fails WP:BIO. Prod contested by sole author, who appears to be a SPA. Ray Talk 19:46, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Bio is significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded. The Subject is notable because he appears on many podcasts, is a writer, and is currently writing a book that will be due out for publication in 2011. Nitroxsurfer — Nitroxsurfer (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep Keep! This guy is awesome. Hbkdinobot   —Preceding undated comment added 20:54, 12 September 2009 (UTC).
 * Striking sockpuppet vote. NW ( Talk ) 00:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No independent, reliable sources in the article, and couldn't find any from searching myself. Quantpole (talk) 21:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Interesting guy, who is probably really nice, but basicallyy blogs and self-published stuff. --Alchemist Jack (talk) 10:29, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.