Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Holm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 17:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Daniel Holm

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that he is part of the first team of Brøndby IF. Since he has not played, however, this does not confer notability. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:49, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 1 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:40, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not appear to meet the GNG. Mice never shop (talk) 16:34, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Comments from the teams football director are clear that he's been made part of the first team with the expectation of playing as such it's almost certain he will play and meet WP:NFOOTBALL. The season starts in 14 days, it's a waste of time and energy to delete an article that would very likely be recreated in a few weeks. There's no rush to delete this article before then. There are no firm rules that say this article needs to be deleted before we see happens, and there is WP:NORUSH. This article remaining in place for a few weeks does no harm, so let's show a bit of WP:COMMONSENSE; if something bizarre happens over the summer, the article can simply go to AFD at that time. Nfitz (talk) 19:12, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * This position is not supported by consensus. This year alone, it was raised sixteen times at afd without quickly becoming a moot point, and sixteen times it was rejected. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:53, 7 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:FOOTY, WP:GNG. If he becomes notable that would be the time to create an article, but we can't keep an article because his coach says he might become notable. SW3 5DL (talk) 12:59, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.