Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel J. Allie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 16:18, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Daniel J. Allie

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Yet another campaign brochure, completely unsourced except for primary sources like his own website, for yet another as-yet-unelected candidate in yet another forthcoming election. As usual, merely being a candidate in an election is not, in and of itself, a claim of notability that passes WP:NPOL, and neither is being a city councillor in a city with a population of 41K — if you cannot credibly demonstrate that the candidate was already notable enough for something else to qualify for a Wikipedia article before he became a candidate, then he does not become notable enough for a Wikipedia article until he wins the election. No prejudice against recreation in November if he wins his seat, but until then he's a delete. Bearcat (talk) 06:07, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 06:23, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 06:23, 16 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete – Unreferenced BLP that appears to take much of its information straight from the subject's campaign site. Fails WP:GNG and POLITICIAN. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 06:54, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Neither being a member of he Westfield City Council nor being a candidate for the Massachusetts State House provides inherent notability. Furthermore, there are no sources in the article at all. Tiller54 (talk) 17:29, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 03:02, 23 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Doesn't meet WP:POL and is basically an unsourced BLP. 131.118.229.17 (talk) 23:57, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete I would have said to redirect to Massachusetts House of Representatives election, 2014, but it seems no-one has bothered to write that article. --MelanieN (talk) 20:43, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.