Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel J Webb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 21:12, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Daniel J Webb

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:POLITICIAN - a Liberal Democrats member who has not yet stood for local council, let alone an actual seat in Parliament. There is some local news coverage, so I couldn't hand on heart delete it per WP:CSD, so I'll bring discussion here instead Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:41, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I originally nominated this for speedy deletion, but Ritchie333 was right to bring it here, since there is a weak claim of notability. That said, the claim of purely local notability is based on sources from the local newspaper the subject worked for. After removing some BLP violations there's not a lot left apart from a somewhat promotional tone.  Acroterion   (talk)   11:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Run-of-the-mill CV of an individual who's not notable in any field (photographer, businessman, or politician). Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG or any other notability criteria: just a little local press, much of which isn't primarily about Webb (he works in PR so if he didn't get any press coverage that would be more notable). Colapeninsula (talk) 14:14, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 26 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I have seen far "notable on paper" articles be deleted for notability concerns, often citing WP:NOTNOW. In this case, does not seem to meet the notability guidelines for being encyclopedic.  Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 16:29, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOLITICIAN, not notable as a politician, photographer or journalist. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete This individaul is not even close to passing notablity for a politician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:34, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete not yet notable as a politician, press agent, or photographer.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:22, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.