Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel James Morcombe: The Entire Story


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 04:57, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Daniel James Morcombe: The Entire Story

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Non-notable documentary proposed by a 12-year-old child who frequents youtube. Unreferenced to any reliable independent source, fails WP:FILM. WWGB (talk) 11:51, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —WWGB (talk) 11:57, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 11:57, 20 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. The 12-year old is sponsored and assisted by major companies, friends and other adults. The article is noticeable to Pandorica Inc. Productions as it is one of their first major productions and can get them a long way. The article will be extended and improved once the movie goes further into production and more information is released. On the topic of the top comment on this discussion, "12-year-old child who frequents YouTube"? Really? I would like other people to know that age does not defy one's true talent. This 12-year old's true talent is movie-making. --Rhain1999 (talk) 11:56, 20 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and WP:CRYSTAL, the creator also has a conflict of interest. Bidgee (talk) 12:11, 20 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. There are no indications of notability here Nick-D (talk) 12:14, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete for many reasons. No guarantee this film will ever happen.  Obviously fails WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL, but also no evidence of notability, so probably fails WP:GNG too.  Only references are social networking sites.  No results if you google the whole title.  Also note that the one "keep" vote here seems to be the article's originator, and the film's "director".  Hoax?  --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:18, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per the general notability guideline due to no significant coverage from reliable sources about the topic. I have no issue with recreation if coverage does emerge. To the article creator Rhain1999, Wikipedia does not lead in generating content; it follows. The topic must have been covered by other (reliable) sources before we do, and it needs to meet Wikipedia's notability standards, which can depend on the subject matter. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 19:15, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Same reasons as the above 5 deletion comments. North8000 (talk) 19:59, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Okay. So the page will probably be deleted now, but this is not a hoax. The movie will still be created. You have no control over what I do. If this movie does become successful, however, I will enjoy seeing this page rise into a successfully written article and neither a stub nor a hoax, as you word it. --Rhain1999 (talk) 21:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per Erik. As I see it, this is not a hoax, just a project which has not yet been realized. If the movie does become successful in the future, the article can be re-created at that time. That doesn't bother me. I've seen articles about musical artists get deleted multiple times before the artists attained some success, but later the artists attained some success and their articles were re-created and kept. That's how things are supposed to work. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:48, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I understand that. I was just making my point. --Rhain1999 (talk) 06:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per everyone else's comments, and pure common sense. T ofutwitch11  (T ALK ) 23:32, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.