Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Johnston (Consultant)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  21:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Daniel Johnston (Consultant)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Vanity page of a non-notable consultant. No secondary sources of any kind. Biography posted by a representative of the subject, so COI issues as well. DarkAudit (talk) 14:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete per WP:BIO. Subject of little or no notability. Redmarkviolinist Drop me a line 14:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   —David Eppstein (talk) 19:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Uncertain As a scientist, insignificant publication record (4 academic papers, none cited significantly), as a technologist and technical author, his books have been published by a significant technical publisher; some of them reprint his very long list of columns and technical papers, and I suppose he is of borderline significance here. The editorial advisory board memberships are trivial. I would have expected someone with his background to have significantly more professional memberships. DGG (talk) 04:09, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails notability and reliable sources, issues with WP:COI. Bearian (talk) 18:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per Bearian, and probably basically spam anyway. -- Orange Mike  |  Talk  20:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.