Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel K. Kim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Lit Motors. Per WP:PRESERVE — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:21, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Daniel K. Kim

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )


 * Delete &mdash; This article does not seem to credibly demonstrate the notability of its subject. It principally relies upon a single source. The narrow coverage that does exist is very recent and the article shows no indication of longevity. — Fly by Night  ( talk )  01:11, 16 June 2012 (UTC) —  Fly by Night  ( talk )  01:11, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 16 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 15:01, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:16, 1 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Prune, merge and redirect to Lit Motors. Article needs radical pruning in any case to include only relevant cited claims (there appears to be more biographical claims in the article than can be justified from the Korean news article), and then it might sustain a very weak Keep from me. Otherwise, Google Scholar search finds just two patents, nothing in connection with "Land Rover" and Google Books finds nothing for this subject in connection with either. -84user (talk) 13:39, 1 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete (though the prune-and-merge approach recommended above likely has merit). For notability to be demonstrated, there would at minimum need to be a profile of the person, not simply an article about his company that mentions him a few times; and a couple of supporting sources. See WP:GNG and WP:BLP. -Pete (talk) 22:53, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.