Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel K. Longman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:08, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Daniel K. Longman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Longman is a writer on local topics who lacks any clear indication of passing writer or academic notability guidelines, and none of the sources pass the combined reliable and indepth test to show passing the general notability guidelines. John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:03, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  22:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  22:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  22:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- A prolific author with a press publishing popular (non-academic) history. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- non-notable as an author. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:TOSOON at best. Smmurphy(Talk) 18:06, 31 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.