Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel M. Ritchie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Consensus to delete due to lack of notability. Chillum 05:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Daniel M. Ritchie

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable person, clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Also, so much WP:PUFFERY, and BLP violations through unsourced content Joseph2302 (talk) 23:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now - I'm not seeing any notability here and my searches found nothing significant and notable aside from a few fitness websites I'm unfamiliar with. SwisterTwister   talk  17:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG LavaBaron (talk) 23:13, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

What can I do to avoid deletion of this page? Would more credible research or sources be of assistance? I'm new to this and am willing to make whatever changes are necessary. Thank you in advance for any advice. TGCJKS197276 (talk) 02:33, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't worry if I were you, you can always save it to your userspace for now (i.e. User:TGCJKS197276/Daniel M. Ritchie) because unless he gets more significant coverage (such as news) within the next few months, there's no saving the article. Cheers! SwisterTwister   talk  04:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

7Delete no evidence of notability under WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR, and the references that are there seem to be primarily PR or notices. The one book that is listed was self published using Create Space, and, According to WorldCat, held in only one  library WorldCat book entry. DGG ( talk ) 02:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. The "2014 Personal Trainer of the Year" is the only thing that looks like it might give some notability to the subject, but I don't think it's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete this resume. You'd think that an article about a notable person with a medicine related Ph.D. could have better sources than the Lafayette Chamber of Commerce. — Brianhe (talk) 04:14, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment. In the interest of disclosure for the panelists commenting here, the creator, TGCJKS197276, is a paid editor for both this article and the one on Cody Sipe. Agricola44 (talk) 17:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.