Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel M Nehrbass


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 16:22, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Daniel M Nehrbass

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. References are not sufficient, are from self-published sources, or have only passing mention of the article subject. Fails to meet GNG. GregJackP  Boomer!   01:52, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. Refs are as follows:
 * Local paper, local coverage.
 * Self-published.
 * Self-published.
 * Self-published.
 * Local paper, local coverage.
 * Self-published, organization he runs.
 * Self-published, organization he runs.
 * Trivial coverage, passing mention in article on another person.
 * Self-published, uploaded by organization he runs.
 * Trivial coverage, passing mention in article.
 * Trivial coverage, passing mention in article, basically a duplicate of above.
 * Trivial coverage, passing mention in article.
 * Not reliable source, blog.

As indicated above, not enough to meet WP:GNG. GregJackP  Boomer!   02:07, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. NintendoFan (Talk, Contribs) 03:01, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

(talk) 00:29, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 11 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Selective merge to Nightlight Christian Adoptions. The organisation is certainly notable. Searching finds some hits with the name "Dan Nehrbass." The nom appears not to have done a WP:BEFORE check, and just looked at what's in the article. -- 101.119.14.254 (talk) 05:18, 12 November 2013 (UTC) — 101.119.14.254 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Merge per previous contributor, but mainly the adoption section. I not that the previous leader of that organisation has a redlink.  Peterkingiron (talk) 18:46, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep as is. References in the article are not all as nominator described. For instance, the book by Wipf and Stock is not a self-published source.  Not all websites referenced are organizations run by the subject of the article.  Local news sources are significant, and have credibility. User:Kristinan1994  —Preceding undated comment added 23:25, 15 November 2013 (UTC)  has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and AFD.  GregJackP   Boomer!   06:18, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:43, 18 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per GregJackP's excellent analysis of the sources. A merge isn't out of the question, but with seemingly no reliably-sourced biographical information, it's not clear what, specifically, could be merged. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:07, 20 November 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.