Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Marcus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 19:08, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Daniel Marcus

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested prod. Non-notable. Fails WP:AUTHOR StAnselm (talk) 22:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:04, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Tentative delete. Sources only go to his bio. I would maybe view it differently if the entry included some writeups of his work. But with only bios, then delete.SoxFan999 (talk) 00:15, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep I added some write ups of his work. There are quite a lot out there, but I only added two.  This author has had multiple stories published in respected literary journals and has also had 3 books published (to date).  I think his contributions definitely make him notable. Article does need some expansion though.  -- alan1701alan1701 07:58, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Leaning keep. At least two write-ups of his work in clearly reliable sources. Would like to see a couple more to be sure, but per alan1701 it seems likely they exist.--Arxiloxos (talk) 20:06, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * keep. I'm satisfied based on alan1701's addition that he is notable so am changing my "tentative delete" to keep. But yes, I would like to see some more to make this a better entry.SoxFan999 (talk) 01:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.