Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Maycock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was - deleted

Daniel Maycock
Google search comes up empty. Doesn't seem to have done anything significant -- Robert Pendray 01:17, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to be a hoax; even if it weren't, the parts that would be verifiable aren't notable and vice-versa. -- Antaeus Feldspar 01:24, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Two entries appear to have been merged into one, or someone tampered with the entry. Daniel Maycock is an up and coming composer, and therefore should be recognized for his works. -- This unsigned vote is by 68.116.23.111, the author of the original article, who also tampered with other people's comments on this VfD and who removed the VfD tag from the article.
 * Delete. Ambi 05:10, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Special:Contributions/68.116.23.111 again removed the VFD tag from the article, removed the above comment about his vote, and changed Ambi's vote to keep. &mdash; Knowledge Seeker &#2470; (talk) 07:40, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. All of 68.116.23.111's edits seem quite questionable.  For instance, this one to the day's featured article.  Yeah... Roberto?  Cute.  --  TomPreuss 08:02, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. I personally know Daniel, and while portions of the entry are factual, portions are not, and there is hardly a need to clog Wikipedia with mundane information.--68.69.203.9 06:20, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.