Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel McFarlan Moore


 * This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.

The result of the debate was keep. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 11:27, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)

Daniel McFarlan Moore
64.166.85.66 marked this vfd on Feb 21, but never made a subpage or listed it on vfd. I'm just listing it here; do not consider this a vote. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 00:00, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * keep. Moore is notable.  See .  However, someone please expand it into a full article. Bubamara 04:58, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable person. I have expanded the document a little. --Fuzzball! 21:44, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, I didn't realise anons could nominate - David Gerard 09:39, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't see why they couldn't, as long as they have a good reason. Nevertheless, keep this article. Radiant_* 12:58, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * 'keep this please. Yuckfoo 01:31, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep--Myles Long 15:55, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.