Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel P. Biebuyck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:CSK #1. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Daniel P. Biebuyck

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The only sources I'm finding on this person have been released by the University of Deleware, where they worked. Thus, the article (which is promotional in fashion) fails WP:GNG. -Indy beetle (talk) 02:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC) Please withdraw due to reasons stated below. -Indy beetle (talk) 02:46, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. With many published reviews of his books (which can be used to source his intellectual contributions, if not his preference in breakfast cereals) he passes WP:AUTHOR. Here are the first five that I found searching for his name in JSTOR:    . Several of these also have significant citations in Google Scholar in what I think is a low-citation field, making a case for WP:PROF. The article needs work but WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * comment all of these except  are books where the subject is the editor and not the author, so they would not count per  WP:NAUTHOR. --hroest 18:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If you want to take more time effort and go through the nearly-300 jstor reviews matching "Biebuyck" and pick out the authored ones, go ahead. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:03, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * PS Also note published obituary and employer memorial, from which we learn that he had a named chair, passing WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:22, 13 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep on basis of reviewed publications. I note that these are single authored, so all their credit accrues to him. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:29, 13 June 2021 (UTC).
 * Keep per above analysis. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:45, 13 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.