Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Pinder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:33, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Daniel Pinder

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Props to Pinder's PR team for getting a handful of semi-reliable to reliable sources to republish the same press-release like puff pieces, repeatedly, about the same non-notable film. This article is nothing more than a puff piece/vanity spam and I seriously question the integrity of every single source that "reported" or mentioned his role in Chicago PD as being "significant" or "well known." I don't know if those are written by contributors or if they lack any fact checkers but I can find no real coverage of this role and even his own iMDb lists it as a completely insignificant, one time character, "Skateboard kid." All of the sources that have written about him are actually in this article, which doesn't leave me any hope that he is actually notable. More than half of the sources are about a film that isn't notable and are basically copied with a few words rearranged from the other. Praxidicae (talk) 15:52, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:57, 3 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails NACTOR, no notable roles. Reywas92Talk 18:16, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not meet WP:ANYBIO (no "widely recognized contribution") - does not meet WP:NACTOR (no "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.") - Epinoia (talk) 03:00, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:ANYBIO.  Nice work on the source evaluation table. - GretLomborg (talk) 18:29, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I accepted this at AfC but didn't leave any notes as to why on this one. I have reviewed the sources both in the article and on the talk page and I can;t make a good case for notability. ~Kvng (talk) 01:44, 10 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.