Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Pinkston


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Daniel Pinkston
Fails WP:BIO. No evidence of significant contributions in government or of notable publications. A few online interviews and mentions of his name within other articles (of which he is not the subject). Seems to have been created to fill out the claims of notability of a different article, also up for deletion; see Articles for deletion/Gary Dale Cearley. Kafziel 19:20, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Does seem to be acknowledged as an expert in his field, but no evidence of major policy impact or of important publications.  I'm not convinced he merits an article. Shimeru 20:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete some of the article is copyvio - cut 'n paste from    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  00:59, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, but could be a keep if there's more. I've tagged it as a bio-stub Ohconfucius 10:57, 4 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.