Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Ross (American actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. To clarify, although the "vote" stands at 2 to 3, the delete voters are citing policy and have more substantive arguments for their position. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Daniel Ross (American actor)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I speedied this earlier as blatant self-promotion of an utter non-notable voice actor. However, it has been restored and as a copy-paste violates GFDL. If the community wants to keep this, then the history should be restored, but I suggest you may not want it. He's had 'background' voice roles in some movies - meaning? He's 'auditioned for' - presumably unsuccessfully. And he's a 'fan of' - who cares? Having an entry in the IMDB isn't evidence of notability. If anyone can find a reason to keep this, fine by me. -Docg 16:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, if we must vote to make a speedy stick. No real notability asserted, pace "substantial roles in independent films". --Dhartung | Talk 22:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The entry on IMDB makes him notable in my opinion. Is this article harming you by being here? Xanucia 22:50, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, as far as I gather any actor can get on to the IMDB, so that alone doesn't make you notable. What are you suggesting he's notable for? Being on a database?--Docg 00:10, 6 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable actor with ongoing career. Yakuman (数え役満) 05:15, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Fine, but what is it? And what's secondary sourcing?--Docg 08:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Only speaking roles have been minor parts in low-budget indies. Hardly a "notable actor" as previously opined, at least not yet. Caknuck 00:59, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.