Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Rothschild (philosopher)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:09, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Daniel Rothschild (philosopher)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I could not find any in-depth coverage about this person. RoostTC (please ping me when replying) 03:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. RoostTC (please ping me when replying) 03:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United States of America. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 04:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keeep A "Professor" in the UK system is equivalent to a "Distinguished Professor" in the US system which shows notability according to wp:professor. The citations in Google Scholar are also significant for a philosophy professor. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 11:09, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Where do our guidelines say a UK professor is equivalent to an American distinguished professor? JoelleJay (talk) 23:03, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Nowhere. But there are some respectable (for philosophy) cites on GS so I am Neutral move to Keep. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:53, 7 December 2022 (UTC).
 * Academic ranks in the United Kingdom Ali Pirhayati (talk) 00:47, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * And so? Xxanthippe (talk) 01:32, 8 December 2022 (UTC).
 * That says UK "professor" encompasses the equivalents of US "professor", "distinguished professor", and "chaired professor"; that doesn't mean that all UK professors hold each of those titles. JoelleJay (talk) 02:37, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:33, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:43, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:07, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Full professor at a good research university, in the US, UK, or elsewhere, is suggestive but not determinative. It doesn't meet any actual notability criterion (in particular, it is not by itself enough for WP:PROF), but I would expect most people with this rank to have done enough to meet some other criterion. In this case the only one seems to be WP:PROF, and I think the record on Google Scholar (three publications with 100+ citations each, in a field where there are some superstars but most citations are low) is above threshold. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:14, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak keep. I think that the citation record in a low citation field is a marginal pass of WP:NPROF C1.  I am skeptical of the WP:NPROF C5 case, but passing one notability criterion suffices. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 18:38, 13 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.