Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Sepiol


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  14:07, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Daniel Sepiol

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No real indication of notability, only sources are routine 'match reports' on poker news sites and a stats database. Doesn't meet WP:NBIO. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Malinaccier ( talk ) 17:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  14:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Games,  and United States of America. UtherSRG (talk) 12:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep World Championship win + bracelet win should merit inclusion. Now satisfactory backed up. PsychoticIncall (talk) 10:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * As I've asked in other AFDs, please read and understand WP:SIRS and then list WP:THREE references you feel are SIRS. WP:BURDEN is on you to prove notability, not just assert it through non-policy means (which is what you are attempting). - UtherSRG (talk) 14:26, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * And again - the sources are all there backing up the main statement probably even more obvious than ever before (Las Vegas Review Journal isn't just providing routine match reports). PsychoticIncall (talk) 11:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * weak delete sourcing depth just isn't there for a biography IMO. It might just scoot over WP:N, but I really don't think we have enough for a biography. Hobit (talk) 17:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Of the current sources, the only one I'd say meets the WP:GNG (marginally) is the first one from the Las Vegas Review-Journal, which does delve into a significant event. The remaining sources are of the routine coverage variety with little in the way of actual in-depth coverage needed to meet notability guidelines. Let&#39;srun (talk) 01:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.