Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Sillekens


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. This is a little on the edge for a delete consensus. If anybody has some new information to present which would argue for keep, drop me a note on my talk page and I'll consider relisting this. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:11, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Daniel Sillekens

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (biographies) requirement. Prodded by User:Jimfbleak, deprodded by User:Brianhe - however I don't think that the current expansion satisfies notability. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:16, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook  06:48, 27 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Agree with nom. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 15:36, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 28 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep it's on the bubble but in-depth coverage in a German newspaper, plus two television items from two other countries, seem to establish significant coverage from multiple independent sources. — Brianhe (talk) 20:19, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JohnCD (talk) 14:55, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete as nom TheFrontDeskMust (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:25, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:17, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (gab)  @ 19:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Sources do not seem to be major, neither do the articles written about him. Not notable yet, I would say. AAA3AAA (talk) 09:36, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, I don't speak much German, but http://www.rp-online.de/nrw/staedte/erkelenz/mit-dem-motorrad-um-die-welt-aid-1.704342 this] at the least appears to be a substantial and independent story on Sillekens. Lankiveil (speak to me) 02:15, 30 August 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.