Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Slattery house


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure)    Kadzi    (talk) 20:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Daniel Slattery house

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

"The site of the first Catholic mass in [a small town]" is a very weak claim to notability. Neither the event nor Slattery have anything beyond local significance. Other than the single Globe article, all coverage is very local, and most discuss little more than the mass happening. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. While I appreciate the Dedhamite respect for its own history, and somebody's dogged thoroughness, this is too trivial for its own article.  --Lockley (talk) 21:53, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. While primarily of local interest, it is not exclusively so. WP:5P1 says that "Wikipedia combines many features of general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers." This is something that would fall under a specialized gazetteer certainly, as well as a specialized encyclopedia. A few of the sources are going to have narrow audiences, sure, but that does not mean they are not reliable. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slugger O'Toole (talk • contribs) 13:17, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:55, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge >>>> as contributing property to Dedham Village Historic District, the boundaries which encompass the house.Djflem (talk) 19:43, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D My Son  03:55, 14 July 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   13:50, 22 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.